What You Need To Know About Land Patents: Part IV with Ron Gibson

JFS 16 | Land Patents

JFS 16 | Land Patents


Still with Ron Gibson, we continue the fourth part about what you need to know about land patents as we dive deeper into state judges and their oaths of office. When you go back to the Constitution for Texas and look closely at the Articles, you will almost always spot the phrase “in this state.” Yet nobody really knows and can explain what this means even though all offense against the State or State agencies are committed to it. The State of Texas claims that one who is in violation of the law is always pointed back to “in this State;” however, they cannot prove where this ethereal location is. Where is it then? If all judges follow the law “in this State,” what law exactly are they following? What lands are owned by the United States on the organic land of Texas? Where are the letters that ceded those territories and the letters from the United States receiving the land? We get to the bottom of this as we uncover how it affects real estate and why land patents are even more crucial.

Listen to the podcast here:

[smart_track_player url=”https://www.podetize.com/statsapi/www.podetize.com/wp-content/uploads/fileuploads/11-5b145ef137b51b3d1af0633e9305c43d/02/2019/5334397e3ffd38f5ef8fcb8dc00e9623.mp3″ title=”What You Need To Know About Land Patents: Part IV with Ron Gibson” ]

What You Need To Know About Land Patents: Part IV with Ron Gibson

State Judges And Their Oaths Of Office

I wanted to cover some interesting information with you that we have been working on for several years and that has to do with judges in this state. Let’s go back to the Constitution for Texas and look at this. You can find this in Article 16 General Provisions, Section 1. Official Oath of Office. (a) All elected and appointed officers, before they enter upon the duties of their offices, shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I,” the legal name of the officer, “do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office,” and then whatever their office is, “District Court judge,” and a number or whatever the designation of that office is, “of the state of Texas, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the Laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God.”

Section (b), all elected or appointed officers, before taking the Oath or Affirmation of office prescribed by this section and entering upon the duties of office shall subscribe to the following statement: “I,” the legal name of the officer, “do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly or indirectly paid, offered, promise to pay, contributed or promised to contribute any money or thing of value, or promised any public office or employment for the giving or withholding of a vote at the election at which I was elected or as a reward to secure my appointment or confirmation, whichever the case may be, so help me God.”

The first time reading that, you think that’s pretty straightforward. You probably think you have a good understanding of what that’s actually saying. Let’s go back and look at this just a little closer, Section 1. Official Oath of Office, (a) All elected and appointed officers before they enter upon the duties of their office shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I,” the legal name of the officer, “do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the duties,” that’s a very important word, “of the office,” whatever that office is, “of the state of Texas.” “Of the state of Texas,” is an important word because that’s an office inside the state of Texas, “and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.” You’re led to believe that that’s the United States Constitution. Let me stop right there. The United States Constitution for America, a corporation can have a Constitution. I’ll let that sink in. Let’s go to the next word that’s connected to this, “and laws of the United States.” That doesn’t mean the United States of America Constitution that you and I know or should be familiar with, “and of this state, so help me God.”

The phrase, “This state,” and “In this state,” is one of their trick words. To find that definition, we’ll go over to the Tax Code, which is Title 2 State Taxation Subtitle E Chapter 151. In Chapter 151.004, it’s going to give us meaning. It says, “In this state,” means within the exterior limits of Texas and includes all territories within these limits ceded to or owned by the United States.” This definition is not as simple as one would think on the surface. The question arises, where is “This state?” Where is, “In this state?” If they’re talking about the organic lands of Texas, why wouldn’t they just say Texas or the organic lands of Texas? Instead, they’ve put together a trick word and that trick word is in this state. Let’s read that section again. “In this state,” means within the exterior limits of Texas,” that would be the borders, “and includes,” the word and is a conjunction. Includes is a term that could be used for expansion or exclusion, “and includes all territories within these limits.” Does Texas have territories in these limits? “Ceded to or owned by the United States,” what does the United States own in Texas? The answer will surprise you. The answer is very little. The United States Corporation, which is defined in Title 28 3215 (a) says that the meaning of the United States means a federal corporation.

We’ve written letters to the governor, to the attorney general, to the secretary of state asking what lands have been ceded to the United States. It’s a pretty simple question. It should be a very straightforward answer. Let me read to you out the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17. It says, “To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such districts (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states and the acceptance of Congress.” Those are the letters that we want to see, “become the seat of government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent.” That would be the consent of the state, “Purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which that same shall be,” now they’re going to tell you why the United States would purchase the land, “for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards and other needful buildings, and make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution. The foregoing powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States or in any department or officer thereof.” The very simple question is what lands have been ceded to the United States and where are the letters that the United States has accepted it?

The linchpin of all of this is in the state. If I could explain it this way, when you hook up a tractor and you want to pull a trailer, you have a linchpin. That linchpin, if it’s pulled out, the power from the tractor cannot pull the trailer in. “In this state,” is that linchpin. Writing letters to the public servants, they can’t answer that question. They can’t document that. All of the “judges” in this state are judging and ruling codes, statutes, ordinances in an ethereal location. Ladies and gentlemen, what we’re showing you is that you’ve been lied to again and that the administrative offices cannot be trusted at all.

[bctt tweet=”‘In this state’ means within the exterior limits of Texas and includes all territory within these limits ceded to or owned by the United States. So, what land does the United States own in Texas?” via=”no”]

Time and time again, they have proven that they cannot be trusted. You can get from the secretary of state the appointment of any judge. I will tell you that a majority of the judges will use pseudo names in their declarations. They’ve agreed to uphold a Constitution that you don’t even know what Constitution they’re talking about and the Laws of the United States and of this State. The big question is, where is in this state or this state? It’s something to think about, something for you to do your own research and look into this because I’m telling you, “In this state,” is an ethereal location. It does not exist. With that, let’s get into our program with Ron Gibson. Ron, Joseph Farley, how are you?

How are you doing?

Ron, I was going through on the book what you need to know about land patents. On page 31, I came across something that I thought maybe I should read this. We could talk about it. It’s about the IMF issue. Let me read this through. It says, “Federal liens on property tax in a de jure United States of America and under the Common Law, the land patent is the highest evidence of title for sovereign American citizens, evidence of allodial title and true ownership. In a bankruptcy and de facto federal United States inhabited by US citizens and directed by its creditors under Admiralty Law, the real estate is collateral hypothecated against the debt, which has been fraudulently transferred to the international bankers regarding your property. There is a hidden federal lien on all real estate in the federal United States because of the federal debt to the International Monetary Fund. This federal lien is not attached to the land, but to the property in real estate situated above the land. It is assessed and collected through the property tax.”

Eric Madsen asserts real estate of the United States was quitclaim deeded to the International Monetary Fund, IMF, by the last sitting US Supreme Court in 1944 as their last action. The title, interest in land still belongs to we, the people, the king to lease the liens on equitable title. Discover how much federal debt is attached to your property and real estate by writing the Department of the Interior and requesting an accounting of what portion of the federal debt is attached to your property. To motivate them, tell them that you want to pay off the debt in full. Borrow FRNs if necessary to discharge the debt in full or offer to pay the debt in full with gold or silver, they will refuse to accept.

You can sue the title company for treble damages for not revealing the hidden federal lien when you purchased the property and the real estate in the first place. They failed to perform on their end of the contract. They will likely settle out of court. This lien must be satisfied, paid or released to own equitable title to your property and real estate free and clear as well as any outstanding bank mortgages. Notify the county tax assessor that the taxes liens have been satisfied in full.” Please take us off the tax rolls forever. Ron, there’s a lot of great information in there. Once you get this information, in any court situation, the evidence is paramount. You have to get everything in order before you start any type of transaction. Justin, if you have this available about the UCC, if you could pull up that little section and read that for us, then we can start our discussion.

3-603 of the Uniform Commercial Code Subsection A, Tender of Payment. If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under the simple contract. Subsection B. If a tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of tender, of the obligation of an endorser or accommodation party.

JFS 16 | Land Patents
Land Patents: All of the “judges” in this state are judging and ruling codes, statutes, ordinances in an ethereal location.


Tying back to Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2, where it says, “The Congress shall have the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting to the territory or other property belonging to the United States. Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed as to prejudice any claim of the United States or any other particular state.” The point is that we have gotten to the point of coming up to say back to the phrase in this state, under the tax code, “That’s fine. If in this state means within the exterior limits of Texas and includes all territories within these limits, ceded to or owned by the United States, what lands do the United States own?” The real answer is none.

It’s only military bases, ammunition, ports, docks, post office and other neutral buildings. Other than that, they don’t have any constitutional authority on it. It’s the same thing with the water. We have a big issue here in Oregon.

Even in the cases that you mentioned, they don’t have it. The Constitution in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 says that there are certain things that have to be present when land is transferred from a state to the federal government. The first thing that has to happen is that the legislature of state sells it to the federal government. The federal government has to pay for it. Once that’s done, the federal government must send a notice of acceptance of jurisdiction. If they don’t send that notice of acceptance of jurisdiction, there is no jurisdiction there.

The federal government is arresting people off the street for violating federal crimes that they haven’t violated because there is no jurisdiction there. That’s another thing that we have been trying to do here. They cannot come up with the notices that there is jurisdiction. They can’t come up with that jurisdiction. The Supreme Court in Adams versus the United States says specifically, “Yes, they have to have that.” That case involved three military men that allegedly raped a woman on a military base in the State of Louisiana. The State of Louisiana at the time had already ceded the land to the federal government. The rape took place. After the rape took place, the federal government claimed jurisdiction. They sent the notice of acceptance of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court said, “Because they hadn’t sent that notice at the time of the rape, then they didn’t have jurisdiction.” It’s that simple.

That what was I alluding with you gentlemen about the issue of jurisdiction. That’s a powerful instrument and without it, they are totally void of any authority to do anything. That’s the whole issue about getting back to the land disposal. There’s nothing in that Article 4, Section 3 Clause 2 that says the government can turn around and implement a legislative act. It gives in the title to that land. The government can’t own that land. They can only hold it in trust.

That’s not ownership when somebody rebuts it.

[bctt tweet=”California has one of the lowest property rates out there as far as tax rates.” via=”no”]

They’re in trustees of the people’s property, of the people’s land if you please.

The people just have no clue.

They have no clue. That’s part of the reason I wrote the book. I laughed at my son pulling all of this pile of stuff. You wouldn’t believe it. It’s this lifelong pile of documents. He walked by. He shook his head. I asked him what he was laughing at. He said, “Dad, when you start in that, they’re going to have the people in information overload in about a couple of minutes.” That’s exactly what’s happened. I get calls from all over the United States and Canada. “What do you mean? I never knew that. Wow.”

Justin and I have read this book twice. We’ve gone through it and begin to pull all the cases. It’s crystal clear once you do two things. That is to take the time to sit down, read it and understand it. Pull the cases and read the cases, and spend some time on this. This is not something that like most people will do. They get a ticket on Thursday and have to be in court the next week. They want to read up on the Transportation Code. It’s too late. Now is the time to study for this. For instance, California has one of the lowest property rates out there as far as tax rates. California is being bankrupt. Trump has demanded them to return $3.5 billion now on this Green Train Project that failed. The only remedy that the state is going to have is to raise the property taxes on the people’s home. You say, “The price of the home is going down.” Yes but the property tax is unlimited. It’s like going into an attorney and say, “How much do you charge?” You pick the rate, but I get to keep the clock. That’s really what they’re getting ready to do. When people’s property rate doubles, when that happens, it’s going to be too late because this is a steep learning curve. You need to get in it now and begin to digest this.

You brought up a very interesting point about the cases that I cite in the book. There are many more. I didn’t put them all in there saying it’d be a whole long block of encyclopedia of case law and stuff. The point that I’m trying to make is that I wanted to show that what I’m trying to share with people was not just some opinion of Ron Gibson’s. I’m trying to show that there are numerous and a consistency of the cases that had to do with land law. If you start reading one, read another, pretty soon you get a sense that there is something pretty special about these patent issues.

That’s what I tried to bring forward because no one else even knows what I’m talking about. I’ve been called a liar to my face, “You don’t know what you’re talking about, Ron.” Let’s see. I will tell you a little story. I’m the Chairman of the largest paying district in the United States. We cover a better part of four states. When we did our assertion letter to the government entities for coordination, we set a notice, I did, on behalf of the assembly that if they wanted to disagree with what, we, the miners were conveying in law.

JFS 16 | Land Patents
Land Patents: The only remedy that the state is going to have is to raise the property taxes on the people’s home.


I’ve got some of the best researchers there are. These guys don’t miss anything. The point being I said, “We will be glad to meet with you, but bring your documents.” In other words, I was saying, “You can disagree with me if you want, but bring something of substance, not just your opinion.” That was several years ago. To this day, of thirteen government entities, not one single one ever has said, “Ron, I want to come and meet with you and debate the issue you were talking about,” not one. I don’t say that to be bragging or boasting. What I’m trying to convey here is I’ve spent a lifetime in law and it’s almost like a love-hate relationship because I see it’s so perverted now, so manipulated and so misunderstood. That’s the reason that they went to administrative law. They call it equity law. There was never to be an equity court.

Please explain that.

You have two types of court. You have a law court and you have an equity court. The law court deals with law. Sometimes law can be pretty harsh. Here’s what it says, here’s what it means. We execute based upon those factors. In an equity case, the judge gives and has tremendous latitude and discretion about the rule, however, he wants to make something fair if he feels that that’s necessary in a case. What happens in those cases is you’d greatly damaged the value of law by doing that because there are no set boundaries in an equity case. In law, there are. Here’s the case before, here’s the case before that. In an equity case, “Even though this guy is 100% right, they’re 100% wrong. I’m just going to give green to this other poor guy because I feel sorry for him.” That’s how it works. Therefore, your law part is so diluted that nobody knows the difference anymore.

This administrative code is written for them. When I say them, I’m talking about federal government employees. Everybody that is attached to it. That attachment goes through all the states. Any state worker, those rules, ordinances and codes are for them. When they drag you into court, they want to put that on you. If you don’t know any difference, then you’re done.

I’ve read numerous cases toward the federal courts, especially the federal court. There are a few state ones, but they have said, “If you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any rights.” That’s true because you don’t know when you’re being run over and you don’t know how to defend it.

In your book, it talks about that the patent is prima facie conclusive evidence of title. It says a patent once issued is the highest evidence of title and is a final determination of the existence of the facts.

[bctt tweet=”Bring something of substance, not just your opinion.” via=”no”]

Read that again. When I ask you to stop, stop because there’s a reason I’m going to do this. Read that again.

The patent is prima facie conclusive evidence of title.

That does not say that that letter is patent. That paper that you have is your title, does it?


It’s prima facie evidence of your title. If this is evidence of your title, then where is the title? If this is evidence, they’re called letter patents. They’re a one-page document that gives all it needs to be said on it. Your title is in law. Your title is in Constitutional Law. Your title cannot be altered, changed, deleted, manipulated or whatever because it’s in Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2. What’s interesting about that, once that patent is issued, that patent title for the sake of that is held constitutionally safe. That’s why no state court can screw with it. That’s why it cannot be impaired. That’s why you can’t exercise an ex post facto against it. That’s why it’s covered by Treaty Law and protected by Treaty Law. That’s why they cannot implement a bill of attainder. All those items are protective covenants to protect that patent and the holder of that patent. That’s why mortgage cannot infringe upon that patent. That’s why a court case cannot infringe, impair that obligation of that contract. I don’t know if you realize the point I’m making. It’s powerful stuff.

What they’ve had to do is create a word called real estate and dupe everybody.

JFS 16 | Land Patents
Land Patents: If they don’t bring a patent forward, they can’t do anything.


Let me ask a question, Ron, because you brought something up here. Let’s use my house as an example. Some place in the past in Texas, there has been a land patent here. The people that are trying to foreclose on my house don’t have that patent in their possession. They can’t foreclose on it. That was what I was after. That’s what I thought you said. It’s my job to bring that patent forward and claim it myself. Even if I don’t do that, if I can’t do that by the time if necessary, if they don’t bring a patent forward, they can’t do anything.

Let me give you a case in point because you bring up an excellent point. Without the title, there can be no infringement or movement of that property. Let me give you a case and I want you guys to look this case up. It’s a fabulous case. It’s listed in my book. It’s called Summa Corporation versus State of California Coastal Commission. It’s a 1984 case. What the state of California decided to do was to come and take by a compensatory taking of Summa Corporation’s tideland and lagoons that went out to the ocean. They took them under eminent domain, foreclosed on it, and the local courts said, “We’ll give your state that property.” Summa appealed. They went to the state appeals court. They ruled against them. They went to the Supreme Court of California. They rule against them. They went to the Federal District Court. They rule against them. They went through the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and they ruled against them. It was decided to hear the case by the US Supreme Court.

In that case, the Supreme Court stated, “Unless the state of California was named on the original patent, they could not come back at a later date and lay a claim to that property.” Bringing that point forward to your foreclosure issue, anyone that wants the foreclosure, you demand that you provide a title that’s superior to mine. Go down to your local County Recorder’s Office. If you know the patent number, if not, get ahold of the BLM and give them your metes and bounds off of your warranty deed and get a certified copy out of the BLM office. He had the General Land Office in Texas.

If you have the original record, get a certified copy. Go to your county recorder, take that document and say, “I want you to pull out of your archive record this exact document. When you find it, I want you to certify it and I’ll pay you for it. When Johnny Do Right comes along and tries to foreclose on your property, you hold that document up and say, “Would you please show me your superior title to that in my land patent?” Because unless he has one and he does it and he won’t and he can’t, in an essence, you have lawful standing to stand there and protect your property at any and all cost. That’s not just in the Summa case, there are numerous cases like that. That Summa case, the Supreme Court spelled it out, under Land Law, no land can be conveyed without a title. No land, zero. It doesn’t matter what the circumstances are. You have to have a title. The only title to that land is a patent.

You have a quote here in the book that says, “Once lost, those rights will be exceedingly hard if not impossible to reclaim.” Quite possibly as Thomas Jefferson said, “The children of this generation may someday wake up homeless on the land their forefathers founded.” We’re here. That day is now because unless you have a land patent, allodial title, you don’t own anything. Something else that’s really important. People are going into court need to realize that there is no money. You have nothing. When they want for you to pay a court cost or a court fee or whatever the case would be, you can very simply say, “I don’t own my car,” because you registered it with the state. You don’t own your home or your real estate because it’s registered with the state. You don’t own your money according to Title 12 411. You have nothing. What they’ve been able to do in a roundabout way over the century is steal everything from the American people.

They want us to be corporate slaves. Do you know what the true definition of human resource is? Corporate slave.

[bctt tweet=”If you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any rights.” via=”no”]

That’s what we’ve become.

We’ve been positioned and had become. We’re a corporate slave.

Until the American people wake up and realize that the people in the administration are to work for us and they hijacked it. Administrative Procedures Act, is that correct?

Yes. I think it was June 11th if I remember correctly.

I looked up the date and it is 1946. One of the things that they have continued to promote through the media, through Hollywood, through everything else, and that is that we are a democracy. When in fact that’s not true. We are a republic.

We’re functioning as a democracy. That’s the difference.

JFS 16 | Land Patents
Land Patents: The American people need to realize that we’re the mark. We’re the product that the corporation is selling for profit.


We might be functioning as a minority because the persons in Washington and the persons in the states are the ones telling the people what to do. The American people don’t realize that we outnumber them. There was an article that came in Arizona about DNA testing. A Republican out there introduced a bill that said, “Anybody that has a license with the state is going to be required to give DNA.” They are pushing this closer and closer and closer to the mark of the beast. If Arizona does not rise up and throw this guy out of office and deal with him harshly and send a message to the rest of the legislature over there as well as all the states.

Here’s the other thing about what you said. Here you have a so-called Republican functioning full force in effect as a Democrat, as a liberal. There’s no difference. They’re all identities. They’re all criminals. They’re deceitful brats, deceivers, liars. Other Republicans turned on Trump when he won the election. His own party turned on him like a pack of wolves. That sold me everything. That’s what they do. The Bible says, “Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing.” Just because you wear a Republican pin doesn’t make you a Republican.

It was even back before Trump’s election, they did the same thing all the way through Bush’s tenure. All the Republicans lay contrary for everything the Democrats wanted.

What has become very apparent is that it is a theater. You have acting judges. You have the bailiff in the courtroom that wears a costume. The judge is wearing a costume. When you read the codes and statutes and everything else, you noticed the word acting like acting attorney general or acting judge or whatever the case is of their particular position because it’s all a theater. The American people need to realize that we’re the mark, we’re the product that the corporation is selling for profit.

You’d never sit down and play Monopoly and not have a clue of what the rules are or any game. This game of life, we’re too busy to read what their playbook is and what the rules are. They had written this so well. It reverts back to a Bible story where they were going to build the gallows, I believe it was Haman. What they have built, they’re going to hang themselves on. These rules, statutes, codes and everything else when the American people know how to use this correctly, we can beat them black and blue with their own statutes.

The Administrative Procedures Act and the statutes and codes were deliberately enacted and called what they were called to circumvent Common Law and God’s law. Do you know what the definition of legal is? It means as the circumventing of God’s law. That’s what the definition is.

[bctt tweet=”Unless you have a land patent or allodial title, you don’t own anything.” via=”no”]

That gets back to a Babylonian type. What would be the right word? I don’t want to use the word state, a concept, the Babylonians did that. We see how well that worked out.

We live in interesting times. I’ve undertaken this issue of law. I’ve got a really good friend of mine I did some law work for. We’re over at his house. I’m sitting at the kitchen table. We got all done. He’d put them in his briefcase. He turned the chair around and he sat down on it right in front of me and he said, “Ron, I have a question for you.” I said, “What’s that?” He said, “Who’s your protege? Who’s going to take this on when you can’t or won’t or something happens to you?” He said, “Who have you got coming up through the ranks?” His name is Rick.

I said, “Rick, let me ask you a question.” I said, “Who do you know that has the background, the will to do it and will devote the time to do it to do what I do?” He pulled way back in his chair and he looked at me and he said, “I don’t know of anybody.” I said, “That’s my answer.” I look at what I do as a mission field. I’m not ashamed of my faith. All of my seminars, I make that fact known right up front. I want to honor in the glory of God. I pray that the day will come when he says, “Enter in now, my good and faithful servant,” because people need to know. I want to especially compliment and thank you too because the mission field that you’ve undertaken because what you’re doing is priceless. I find it astounding that God keeps bringing around believers to help me and to give me support and whatever. I’m dumbfounded at that. I asked for a lot of it. I asked for Godly wisdom and He keeps bringing people around me that are all believers.

When I saw one of your videos, I thought that’s right there because as we move forward and as they begin to squeeze more into people, they squeeze them out of their comfort zone. Here’s the thing about the devil and the satanic issue, is that they always overplayed their hand. They’re going to get the American people just like they have to wake up and to experience enough pain to say, “This is not right. I need to take action.” They’ve for the past several decades have worked diligently night and day to put the American people to sleep. They succeeded. They did a great job on it.

Trump was that turning point. President Trump was the only authority figure because it wasn’t in the churches, that called out fake news for what it really is. It is. It’s fake news. When you do the research with Operation Mockingbird and see that the CIA was the one that orchestrated all that, then you know that you’ve been programmed. Everything you see on television, everything you see in Hollywood. Hollywood is paid to lie. They’re the highest paid liars out there other than Washington, D.C.

The American people, they never saw it. They said, “We just want to be entertained.” It’s put them all to sleep. Those days are coming. That’s why it’s important to get this information and understand it. We’re talking to Ron Gibson of what you need to know about land patents and the reason that these land patents are so important because this is the foundation. Once you understand the foundation, then you can begin to build from there. In the book, you have the steps to your land patent. I think you’ve listed sixteen steps in here. This is a step by step.

JFS 16 | Land Patents
Land Patents: A home is a woman’s domain. If you threatened her home, you’re on the wrong side of the program.


If you’ll go through, read the book at least twice, pull some of these cases, then go back to these steps. You’ll have a real clear understanding of how to get your land patent. If you get your land patent and do nothing with it but you have it for that day, that day is coming up. If the people would have known about the March 9th, 1933 bankruptcy and the gold heist from the American people, if they would have been alerted to that before time, they would never have surrendered their gold. They’ve surrendered their gold. The next step is to surrender the land because all they have to do is double or triple your taxes and you’re done. They’ve stolen your property.

You hit on some important points. I cannot emphasize enough how important this stuff is. I have people all the time telling me, “It’s not affecting me. Why should I do anything about it?” I tried the best I can to let them know, “They’re coming, you’re next.” Do you remember that little saying about during World War II? “They came after the machinists. I didn’t speak up as I’m one of the machinists,” and I forget all of the parts of that. “They came after the Jew and I wasn’t a Jew. There was no one to speak up for me.” That little saying, I don’t have it correct, but the point of it is that we better take a stand.

Here’s a very important fact and that is when you’re in the heat of the battle, you’re not going to operate as well as not being in the heat of the battle. Therefore, learn this stuff before it starts.

I have an old saying and it’s called the Five P Principle: proper planning prevents poor performance. Michael Jordan didn’t become a basketball elite by practicing once or twice a week. Jerry Rice didn’t become the National League leader in receptions and yardage by practicing once or twice a week. Those men got in there and put blood, sweat and tears into doing it so when they got on the field they were winners. That’s what God asks us to do. We have too few people who want to do that.

This takes work and it takes practice on the front end before you ever get to the game. This book that you’ve written is your practice. To be able to go through it, to understand it, you list in your book a summary of a chain of title. I think in this particular case, it’s actually your chain of title that you’ve listed here. It goes back to 1862. That chain of title where you followed it back of who you bought the property from and then who they bought it from, that takes time to do. That takes a lot of work to do.

You’ve spent 30 years paying for your home and probably paid three times the value of it. With the property tax, that’s another 3%. At the end of 30 years, you’ve paid another 100%. You’ve paid four times for a piece of property. You’re too lazy to look up the title of who owns it. That doesn’t make sense at all. If you’re in a home and if you’re making a payment, instead of watching the football game, you ought to get down there and figure out the chain of title and get your allodial title.

[bctt tweet=”Once you understand the foundation, then you can begin to build from there.” via=”no”]

I couldn’t have said that any better because that is so true. The thing that I find interesting too, a lot of people who have taken on the challenge to land patent and forward have come back and told me, “I’m really glad I did it. It’s exciting. I know the total history. I know who bought it when looking through the county records, it’s a history book.” Especially with women, I was surprised how many women are excited to know what their land history is. I’ll tell you, there were a lot of women out there that will fight toe to toenail more so than a lot of men will to protect that home. It’s wonderful. A home is a woman’s domain. If you threatened her home, you’re on the wrong side of the program. Most women are going to defend it.

When you walk into the courtroom and you’ve tracked your patent all the way back to 1862, that judge realizes I’m not dealing with the regular dumb American football-watching knucklehead. I could have some liability here so I need to pay attention. It’s hard to refute that when you say, “No, I bought it in 2011 and here it is all the way back to 1862. Here’s my title. Where’s the bank’s title? Where is the city’s title, the county title, people trying to tax me?” It looks to me like all of you are colluding in fraud against me.

That’s exactly what they are doing. That’s another very good argument too in those situations of foreclosure. Fraud negates any and all contracts. If the bank or the finance company has created any fraud and they have, the first four days that the bank is involved with you. Are you with the bank? Therefore, frauds that are committed automatic right down the line.

There’s no contract. I liked the possibility or the thought of the possibility and probability of going in and looking at the mortgage company as far as a lawsuit, looking at the title company, looking at the city-county school district, and then being able to say, “I’ve been cheated and I want all my money back.” That’s when it’s going to get interesting because now all of a sudden these guys are going to start doing the pee dance trying to figure out, “I need to get out of this room because this is getting ready to get hot.” Justin, did you have anything that you wanted to add to this?

No, you covered it very well. Every time I talked to Ron I get more excited about this.

I wanted to get into the IMF and track this thing back. There’s a spot in the book that I’ve been thumbing through to try and find where you describe the IMF and exactly what they’re doing. It’s a couple of pages. When I read that it was like, “Oh my goodness.” All of a sudden it made so much sense to me. It makes sense what they’re doing. In thumbing through this, I didn’t find it but I’ll find the IMF page in there because that is fascinating.

We’re trying to find stuff, Ron, and we’ve written several letters about the phrase in this state because that is so critical because when you can bust that issue right there, this whole administrative Pinocchios is exposed. We now have them to the point we’re going to file suit against the secretary of state because he’s the keeper of the record. He’s the one that must produce the lands ceded to the United States and based on them hiding everything and the way that they’ve treated us, they don’t have it. He’s also violated the public information request. They’ve just completely run all over that. We have to do a little bit more research on that. Holding these public officials accountable for what they’re supposed to do, it’s a treasure trove of great stuff because they’re not even following their own guidelines at all.

I teach four law classes a month on different subjects of law. I did a series of classes on the breach of fiduciary duty. I would like to encourage you to go look at that. You can pull it up on the internet or if you want information, I’ll be glad to send it to you. That’s right down your alley of what you’re talking about because that’s what they’ve done. I get in the middle of politicians and so-called public servants face a lot, especially a police officer, and they’ll say, “I’m just doing my job.” I’m telling you that winds me up tighter than a nine-day clock. I said, “I don’t care about your job. I really don’t. What I care about is your duty, your fiduciary, your moral duty, your legal duty. What you’re doing is a job, but you’re well out of bounds.” I love to sue those kinds of cases because they’re so easy to prove. It’s a fact they’ve done what they’ve done. They can’t hide it. You go into the public record, you pull all of that. How were you trained, when were you trained?” It’s amazing. You can mop the floor with those teams. It’s based upon a breach of fiduciary duty. If you’re going to do a suit, please include that because that covers a multitude of areas that are very critical.

One of the things that most people don’t realize is the only purpose for government is to secure the rights that were given to me by my Creator. It’s not to pave the roads, take the garbage out, or provide water. The only thing they’re supposed to do is secure my rights. That’s it.

That’s their primary function is to protect rights and property.

Property is right.

That’s where we get our rights is with the property. Wayne Haig said it best, “If you don’t own the property, our property.”

Ron, thank you very much for your time and your information. We’ll talk to you then.

You’re welcome. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to be on your program. I pray to God that it bears fruit because it’s important stuff, whether they realize it now or not.

Thank you very much. God bless you.

About Ron Gibson

JFS 16 | Land Patents

Ron Gibson, for the past 45 years, has been in the construction and mining business. Ron is an engineer by training and secondary studies include constitutional law. Ron has worked for 19 years in mining and general consulting. He is also a mineral producer by profession. Ron has been involved in both precious metals in Industrial Minerals development in all phases. Ron’s background also includes project evaluation, feasibility study, geology, drilling and testing, sampling, plant layout, and design Ron has run the day-to-day operation including marketing, environmental studies, estimating and many other phases of mining operations.

As a managing consultant for large investment groups, Ron learned very early on the five “P” Principle: Proper, Planning, Prevents Poor, Performance.

Ron’s background in law includes a counselor at Law and he is in the process of obtaining his Private Attorney General authority from the Senate Judiciary.


Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share!
Join the Joseph Farley Show Community today:

Leave a Reply